Econdiscussion
  • Home
  • Articles
  • About Me

Articles

"Diving Into the Rich Pool" - The Economist

14/10/2014

1 Comment

 
Synopsis: This article by The Economist suggests that taxing the rich is not the way for governments to alleviate their debt.

Click here to read the original article
Discussion:
While a popular opinion is that taxing the rich during times of economic trouble, this article encourages governments to think twice before doing so, pointing out unintended land negative consequences.  This article answers three questions:

1.     What share of tax do the rich actually pay?
2.     What has happened to the tax burden over the recent decades?
3.     What does the evidence suggest about how the rich respond to changes in taxation?

The rich pay a substantial amount of taxes nowadays (rich Americans pay the most of OECD countries, at 45%).  However, the general trend is that tax burdens have eased up on the rich; many countries have shifted from an extremely progressive tax scheme to a less progressive one-more proportional than anything.

Taxing the rich can be hazardous to an economy-often it is the rich that are most mobile, i.e. an increase in taxes means that the rich leave the country.

Overall, the article suggest that instead of simply increasing tax rates, closing taxation loopholes and broadening the tax base are more efficient ways to bring in income for the government.

Theory:

The phrase in the article “beneficial impact of tax cuts” can be very confusing. How is it that a government could possibly earn more tax revenue by cutting tax rates? The Laffer curve best explains this phenomenon. This is the Laffer curve:
Picture
The x-axis of this curve is the tax rate, while the y-axis is the revenue gained. It can be seen that the peak of this curve is not towards the end, i.e. it is not necessarily that as the tax rate increases, revenue increases. After a certain point, the revenue decreases. This is because more and more people will feel convinced that the tax rate is too high that they need to find a way to avoid the tax – whether that means moving their money to another country or not working altogether. At lower rates of tax, though, the effort of tax evasion might be too high; people might just pay the taxes just because it’s easier than avoiding it.

Notice how the highest tax revenue does not exactly mean a 50% tax; it could be anywhere, depending on the economy. It can also be multi-modal; it does not have to be restrained to one peak.
1 Comment

"Concrete Benefits" - The Economist

8/10/2014

0 Comments

 
Synopsis: Should the U.S. invest in infrastructure now?

Click here to read the original article
Discussion:
This article argues that the U.S. government must take the opportunity now to increase public investment, before this fiscal climate changes.  The writer argues that the fear of increasing taxes to fund such projects is unfounded, as is the fear of slipping further into debt.  He or she cites examples of a boost in GDP due to such projects, covering and surpassing the debt caused.  In fact, it is with slow-growing economies that borrowing and funding is most profitable, due to low interest rates and minimal competition for loans.  It is for these reasons that the writer argues that the U.S. should invest in public goods – the economic climate is just right.  The only problem is what to invest in: while most economies can easily pinpoint deteriorating infrastructure, those projects may be a waste of time and money.

Key words:
Natural monopoly – This is where the lowest price can only be achieved if the market has a monopoly. The article gives three examples of natural monopolies:
“telephone network, electricity grid or sewer system.” The article goes on to explaining why it is best to have a natural monopoly – “fixed costs… are typically high and operating costs relatively low”.

Crowding in – This is the opposite of the crowding out effect, and is where government spending on public projects boosts the demand for a good, and so, increases the private investment in it.

For more on infrastructure and investment, read “Government Spending Booms Not So Great for Long-Term Growth” and “Bridges to Somewhere"
0 Comments

"Not Spluttering Anymore" - The Economist

6/10/2014

0 Comments

 
Synopsis: A quick snapshot of the U.S. economy.

Click here to read the original article
Discussion:
This article updates us on the economic health of the U.S. after the end of QE. While the author presents us with some encouraging statistics, such as an increase in employment and diminishing underemployment, other statistics are not as promising, such as a decrease in the labor force participation rate (LEPR) and stagnant wages.  My guess is that the discouraging statistics will turn around in time, e.g. these statistics are the result of time lag.

D.K. also contrasts the generally positive economic outlook of the U.S with that of the EU, where expansionary monetary policy may be needed. Mario Draghi, the president of the European Central Bank (ECB) is facing opposition from Germany, whose fear that expansionary monetary policy will result in hyperinflation stems from its past bad experiences with hyperinflation. It is worth referring to “Dwindling U.S. Inflation Casts Shadow”, which discusses the fact that, as opposed to hyperinflation taking place, there is minimal inflation at all.

Pay attention to the statement in the fourth paragraph that says, “… unemployment reaches a level where employers have to start paying more to find workers”. The nature of having to pay more is one of the steps in the Phillips curve, which suggests a link between unemployment and inflation, chiefly that as unemployment is lowered, inflation increases. This relationship is shown below (figures not based on real data).
Picture
We can notice now that, even though unemployment has lowered, inflation is not budging. Where did the Phillips curve go wrong?

We will discuss this in later blog posts.

Key words:

Unemployment – This is when those who are actively looking for work cannot find an
Underemployment – Where a worker can find a job, but it does not maximize his capacity. Examples would include those who are only able to find a part-time job, or perhaps an economist with a Ph.D. working as a bus driver.
Hyperinflation – This is when the rate of inflation accelerates, sometimes out of control. One of the most famous examples is in Germany from 1921-1924.
PMI – This is the Purchasing Managers Index and measures the economic health of the manufacturing sector.
LFPR – The labor force participation rate is the ratio between the labor force (those who have a job or are actively looking for one) and the whole working age population. So, those who retire prematurely, for example, are no longer part of the labor force, but are instead part of the rest of the working-age population.

One important analysis point about the LFPR is to do with the rate of unemployment. Let’s say the unemployment rate drops. Does that mean that more people are finding jobs? Perhaps. But it could also mean that people have given up looking for jobs and, in a sense, have retired prematurely. So, the unemployment rate has dropped, but so has the LFPR. The point to remember is that a lower unemployment rate does not equate to a better economic situation.
0 Comments

"Do Poor Countries Really Get Richer?" - The Economist

29/9/2014

0 Comments

 
Synopsis: Is the whole notion of poverty traps exaggerated? Or is there some truth to the idea?

Click here to read the original article.
Discussion:
This article evaluates the recent statement that poverty traps are exaggerated. Instead of looking at whole decades or larger periods, e.g. 1960 – 2010, the author, C.W. looks at decade blocks and points out two main things to show that poverty traps are not a myth:

1. Living standards were exacerbated for the poor countries more that for the rich countries.
2. Any growth rates for poor countries would increase living standards for the rich and decrease them for the poor; i.e. income inequality has risen sharply.

For these reasons, C.W. believes that poverty traps do exist. The author elaborates by saying that while it is not true that long-term poverty traps will never be escaped, short-term poverty are the ones to worry about.
0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    Abenomics
    Adam Smith
    Adverse Selection
    Ageing
    Amazon
    Arrows
    Arthur Okun
    Asset
    Asymmetric Information
    Ben Bernanke
    Booms And Busts
    Braess' Paradox
    Brazil
    Bretton Woods
    Brexit
    Bubble
    Bull Market
    Business Cycle
    Capital Control
    Capital Flows
    Capital In The Twenty First Century
    Capital In The Twenty-First Century
    Carry Trade
    Causation
    Central Bank
    China
    Christopher Sims
    Classical Economics
    Consumption
    Counter-cyclical
    CPI
    Creative Destruction
    Crisis
    Daron Acemoglu
    David Cameron
    David Ricardo
    Debt
    Debt-to-GDP
    Deflation
    Deleverage Cycle
    Demography
    Devaluation
    Developing Economies
    Development
    Diffusion
    Diminishing Returns
    Dominant Strategy
    Dominated Strategy
    ECB
    Economic History
    Economic Theory
    Equality
    Equitity
    Equity
    Equity Investments
    EU
    Exchange Rate
    FDI
    Fed
    Federal Reserve
    Finance
    Financial Crisis
    Financial Instability Hypothesis
    Financial-instability Hypothesis
    Financial Times
    Fiscal Multiplier
    Fiscal Policy
    Fixed Exchange Rate
    Fleming
    Floating Exchange Rate
    Free Market
    Free Trade
    Freshwater
    Game Theory
    GDP
    George Akerlof
    Germany
    GFC
    Gini Coefficient
    Global Financial Crisis
    Globalization
    Government Intervention
    Government Spending
    Great Depression
    Growth
    Heckscher-Ohlin
    Helene Rey
    Hyman Minsky
    ICOR
    Illiquid
    Immigration
    Income
    Inequality
    Inflation
    Infrastructure
    Innovation
    Interest Rates
    Investment
    Italy
    James Robinson
    Janet Yellen
    Japan
    Jean Tirole
    J.M. Keynes
    John Nash
    Keynesian Economics
    Labor
    Lawrence Summers
    Leverage
    Lindau
    Liquid
    Malaysia
    Managed Exchange Rate
    Mario Draghi
    Matteo Renzi
    Michael Spense
    Minsky Moment
    Mixed Strategy
    Monetary Policy
    Monopoly
    Monopsony
    Moral Hazard
    Mundell
    Mundell-Fleming Trilemma
    Nash
    Nash Equilibrium
    Nigeria
    Nobel
    Nobel Laureates
    Nobel Prize
    Paul Krugman
    Paul Samuelson
    Perfect Information
    Phillips Curve
    Politics
    Poverty Traps
    Principal Agent Problem
    Prisoner's Dilemma
    Productivity
    Protectionism
    QE
    Qualitative Easing
    Quantitative Easing
    Redistribution
    Regulation
    Retrenching
    Rich
    Risk
    Robert Shiller
    Saltwater
    Saving
    Secular Stagnation
    Shiller
    Shinzo Abe
    Signaling
    Stakeholders
    Stolper-Samuelson Theorem
    Strategy
    Subsidies
    Tariff
    Taxation
    Taxes
    The Economist
    The Market For Lemons
    Theory Of Comparative Advantage
    Thomas Piketty
    Total Factor Productivity
    Trade
    Trilemma
    UK
    Unemployment
    U.S.
    USD
    Wage Benefits
    Wages
    Wealth
    Wealth Effect
    Wolfgang Stolper
    WTO
    Yuan

    Author

    JANANI DHILEEPAN
    A gap year student trying to explore real-world economics

    Archives

    May 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly