Synopsis: An article on how demography (age) affects inflation.

Click here to read the original article.

Discussion:

This article discusses the link between inflation and demography. Ageing populations leads to “slower growth, because a country’s potential output tends to fall as its labour force shrinks.” They also have to face heavier fiscal burdens because governments must provide for more pensioners from fewer taxes. Given its ageing population, this is a big problem for Japan.

Many economists take persistent deflation in Japan as evidence to show that prices fall when counties age, and consequently, growth slows. The Prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe, has tried disproving that link by increasing inflation through aggressive quantitative easing. However, as inflation has yet to reach the targeted 2%, the tempting conclusion is that ageing populations cause deflation.

Recent research has sought to disprove that link.

It is important to not just see the links between ageing and prices, but the way they cut. In terms of the factors of production, when growth slows, businesses reduce investment so that the cost of capital can decline. However, wages should rise when the supply of workers falls. And in terms of government action, some governments reduce their spending on other projects to support pensioners, causing slow growth and sluggish inflation. Other governments, however, may decide to monetize their debt, pushing inflation up.

The article disentangles all these possibilities to descry a clearer link between an ageing population and inflation.

This article states a few main points:

1) In a recent paper by Mr. Katagiri of the Bank of Japan and Mr. Konishi of Waseda University distinguished between an ageing population caused by lower birth rates and an ageing population caused by increased longevity.

a. Fewer births would lead to a smaller tax base, encouraging governments to “embrace inflation to erode its debts and thus stay solvent”. This will be further explained under ‘context’.

b. Longer lives would cause the ranks of pensioners to swell, along with their political influence. Their influence would augur for “tighter monetary policy to prevent inflation eating into savings”. This will also be explained under ‘context’.

Messrs Katagiri and Konishi believe that the latter (increased longevity in Japan) has caused deflation of about 0.6ppt over the past 40 years. Therefore, it is not just ageing that has caused deflation, it is more longevity.

2) This article then looks at the impact of ageing on financial assets. The “life-cycle theory” suggests that people average out their consumption over lifetimes: “going into debt when young, buying assets when their earnings peak and selling them to pay for retirement”. In theory, it should lead to lower asset values, but in practice, while house prices often fall, stocks rise.

One important aspect is whether the assets sold are domestic or foreign. Messrs Anderson, Botman and Hunt of the IMF found observed the decrease in Japan’s net saving rates from 15% to 0% of disposable net income from the 1990s to 2011. Many of these savings are invested in foreign assets, and when retirees repatriated their funds after selling stocks and bonds abroad, the yen appreciated. This, in turn, causes deflationary pressure by lowering the cost of imports. This can be negated by “strong monetary easing combined with a credible commitment to an inflation target”. In other words, Abenomics.

3) A recent paper by Messrs Juselius, and Takats from the Bank for International Settlements offers a vastly different explanation for how ageing affects inflation, pointing out that Japan may be quite atypical. They observed 22 advanced economies from 1955 to 2010, and found a steady correlation between deflation and demography, even though just the opposite is assumed. They found that a larger share of dependents is linked with higher inflation, while lower inflation is linked with a higher labour force. Their explanation for this is that countries that consume goods more than they produce them (i.e. with a smaller labour force) causes excess demand, and thus, inflation. However, countries that consume less than they produce causes excess supply, and thus, deflation.

This then begs the question of why Japan has such low inflation. Some possible explanations are damaged balance-sheets caused by the asset bubble pop in the 1980s, or the tentative and hesitant Abenomics.

Context:

1) Why does the government need to make “painful cuts as pensioners multiply”? And what does it mean “monetise their debt”? Number 1 is for the former, and number 2 is for the latter.

2) Why would embracing inflation erode a country’s debts? As inflation goes up, the value of the debt goes down in real terms. Therefore, the amount of debt a country owes decreases.

3) In the section, ‘Greyflation’, the article discusses a finding that explains how a larger share of dependents is linked to higher inflation, and how fewer dependents mean lower inflation. I am sceptical about this argument because, if this were the case, what should we expect in the US when baby boomers retire en masse? A spike of inflation? This is contrary to what a lot of people believe.

Synopsis: What problems the EU will face with QE, when it will happen, and how it might come about.

Click here to read the original article.

Discussion:

This article discusses the likelihood of QE in the Eurozone, the necessity of QE, the problems it could face and the manner in which it would happen.

The Eurozone has faced persistent lowflation (which, for the countries in the periphery, means actual deflation). Hence, there has been a push from many countries for QE – “creating money to buy fiscal assets”.  The ECB faces strong opposition from Germany, whose nightmares about hyperinflation eclipse the need for QE to put a stop to sliding inflation.

Both core and headline inflation are slipping lower and lower – substantially lower than the ECB’s 2% target. The all in oil prices itself is a welcome relief for many countries, where the decrease in oil prices reduces their own costs of production. However, if the lower costs of production make people expect deflation (or even lower inflation), deflation will happen, true to its self-fulfilling nature.

Lowflation is equally as harmful as deflation, where the latter means an increase in the real value of debt (debt is in nominal terms), and the former means prices rising slower than what the government expected when they first borrowed money.

As the ECB can no longer decrease the interest rates (it is currently at 0.05%), they must try to expand their own balance sheet by buying sovereign bonds. They plan on expanding it by 1tn euros, although when this will happen is unknown.

Past attempts at increasing their balance sheet and pumping money into their economy was as not fruitful as the ECB had hoped – only 212bn euros of the 400bn euros was borrowed by banks from 2011-2012. One potential reason for this is that banks were not willing to borrow money during a stagnant economy.

Because Germany has its own reservations about the ECB’s buying sovereign bonds, the ECB is also buying covered bonds and asset0backed securities, neither of which is big enough to absorb the whole of the QE needed.

The ECB also has the option of borrowing corporate bonds, but even that market is not substantial.

The ECB, therefore, must buy public debt.

Whenever the ECB may enact QE, the program is unlikely to surpass 500mn euros, which may or may not be sufficient to aid the economy.

Context:

This post about the ECB and QE by Ambrosse Evans-Pritchard discusses similar things, and hence, is worth reading. Both articles reach a similar conclusion that the scale of QE the ECB plans to do is insufficient.

Synopsis: The effects of and solutions to deflation.

Click here to read the original article.

Discussion:

This article discusses the effects of and the lack of potential solutions to the current worldwide deflation.

Christopher Sims, a Nobel laureate who specialises in causality in macroeconomics (quoted in this article) warns that QE by itself has little effect on monetary patterns, and thus, on inflation. He says that the only reason Anglo-Saxon QE worked at all is because the central banks (BoE and the Fed) “talks a better game” (which, in its essence, is qualitative easing) than the ECB.

The effects of deflation are:

1) Pre-emptive retrenching, given consumer expectations for prices to decrease.

2) Decreased investments and increased savings from businesses who expect a hit.

Overall, the two points above mean that there will be less money circulating the economy. Notice how those two points show that an expectation of deflation causes deflation – these two reasons are the main reasons why deflation is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Whether QE works to increase deflation can be seen by observing Japan, whose large-scale bond-buying programme is meant to encourage inflation.

Key words:

1) Money indicators: money indicators measure the amount of money in an economy. Different definitions of money supply include cash, or cash and deposits, or checks.

These definitions, according to Investopedia, are:
a) M0: Hard cash and coins
b) M1: M0 + checking accounts, traveller's checks, demand deposits
c) M2: M1 + savings accounts, time deposits (less than $100,000), money market funds

2) Primary surplus: This is where government income – government expenditure > 0 but the interest on the loan has not been paid back yet. For another blog post that discusses the primary surplus, click here.

Context:

What is Sims referring to when he says that the Fed “talks a better game” than the ECB? This is the idea of qualitative easing (more can be read about this here), where the Fed assured the economy that it will do its best to decrease unemployment and increase inflation, i.e. they said that they would carry QE through to the end. I disagree that the ECB doesn’t “talk a good game”. In fact, in 2012, Draghi said that the ECB will “do whatever it takes” to improve the economy. In 2012, many people believed that the periphery Eurozone countries would split from the EU. As a result, borrowing rates for the PIGS countries increased, and confidence in the euro was lost. Draghi responded by saying that the ECB would do "whatever it takes" to save the euro. Because of this, the faith in the Euro was restored and the borrowing rates for the periphery countries dropped. Click here to read the official statement made by Draghi.

Synopsis: With all the different directions that different economies are dealing with their QE, what are the repercussions?

Click here to read the original article

Discussion:
This article discusses the repercussions of the lack of synchronization between the Federal Reserve’s and the Bank of Japan's monetary actions. While the Fed has ended its bond-buying practices, the BoJ has just intensified it. Consequently, the yen fell sharply against the dollar, which will hopefully increase exports and production in Japan, battling its long-lasting deflation. However, this means that other exporters might have to lower prices in other countries to compete in the global markets. The writer thinks that this might cause worldwide deflation. The author then talks about how the stagnant state of inflation in the US (which has not yet capitulated to the worldwide deflation that the writer fears) has caused the gold price to drop. The U.S. and Japan’s central banks’ diverging monetary decisions are causing a rift in the global markets.

I will be summarizing the points made in this article in a flow chart in the next post, as well as problems I am seeing while applying this article to the actual situation in Japan.